Audits play a critical role in workplace safety, particularly in environments dealing with hazards like chemical exposure, electrical risks, or machinery operations. But while identifying problems during an audit is vital, the real value comes from what happens afterward — how organizations act on those findings. That’s where the process of effectively closing out audit findings becomes essential.
Closing audit findings isn’t just about ticking boxes; it’s about reducing workplace risks, complying with legal requirements, and improving overall safety culture. In this guide, we’ll walk through best practices to ensure that hazards identified in an audit don’t remain unresolved.
Understanding the Value of Closing Audit Findings
Imagine you’re working in a busy manufacturing plant. The audit team visits and points out several safety issues — like improperly stored flammable materials or employees not wearing PPE. If those issues are left unaddressed, the workplace remains unsafe, and accidents become inevitable.
Closing audit findings helps ensure that:
- Hazards are mitigated or eliminated.
- Corrective actions are tracked and completed.
- Compliance is maintained with safety standards such as ISO 45001 or OSHA regulations.
- Workers are protected from preventable harm.
This is especially important for individuals studying workplace safety through certifications like the NEBOSH course. The NEBOSH course fees may seem like a significant investment, but understanding how to close out audit findings can help safety officers apply their knowledge effectively and protect lives on the ground.
Step-by-Step Guide to Effectively Closing Out Audit Findings
Step 1: Review the Findings Thoroughly
Before taking action, ensure you fully understand the auditor’s observations. Don’t assume anything.
- What is the actual hazard?
- Where exactly is it located?
- Who is impacted?
🔗 Learn more about types of audit findings from ISO.org.
Take time to clarify unclear observations with the auditor. This is especially important in high-risk environments like chemical plants or construction sites.
Step 2: Prioritize the Findings Based on Risk
Not all audit findings carry the same level of danger. Some may pose an immediate threat to life or equipment, while others might be minor procedural issues.
Create a risk matrix that evaluates:
- Severity of potential harm
- Likelihood of occurrence
- Number of people exposed
Then assign a priority level — high, medium, or low — to each finding.
🎯 Anecdote: In one factory, a broken handrail on an elevated platform was marked as “low priority” until a worker slipped and fractured a rib. After that, the company adopted a strict policy of escalating any physical hazard.
Step 3: Assign Responsibility
Every corrective action needs an owner — someone responsible for resolving the issue. Assign the finding to a department head or safety officer and set a clear deadline.
Use tools like:
- Safety management systems (SMS)
- Audit tracking software
- Even simple spreadsheets
Having a NEBOSH-trained safety officer in charge increases the likelihood of effective resolution, as they understand hazard controls and legal standards.
Step 4: Develop and Implement Corrective Actions
This is where the real work begins. For each finding, identify a specific corrective action.
Example:
- Finding: Employees not using face shields while handling corrosive chemicals.
- Action: Procure face shields, conduct training, and enforce PPE policy.
When implementing solutions, make sure they are:
- Realistic
- Time-bound
- Aligned with internal safety protocols
📚 If you're unsure how to plan corrective actions, refer to resources from OSHA and HSE UK.
Step 5: Verify Completion
Closing a finding doesn’t just mean writing “done” in a report.
You must verify:
- The corrective action was actually implemented.
- It addresses the root cause.
- It’s effective in preventing recurrence.
Use evidence such as:
- Photos of the fix
- Training records
- Interview feedback
- Safety inspection reports
👷 A client once assumed they’d “fixed” a blocked fire exit by posting a sign. It wasn’t until a follow-up inspection that they realized boxes were still being stored in front of it. Verification would have caught this.
Step 6: Document Everything
Always keep thorough documentation. This includes:
- The original finding
- Corrective actions
- Evidence of completion
- Dates and responsible persons
Good documentation is essential for compliance audits and internal reviews.
Step 7: Communicate the Outcome
Let stakeholders know that the issue has been resolved. This can include:
- Department staff
- Safety committees
- Top management
Transparent communication builds trust and demonstrates a commitment to a safe workplace.
Avoiding Common Mistakes
Here are some pitfalls to avoid:
- Ignoring low-priority findings: Minor issues can become serious over time.
- Delayed actions: Timeliness matters. Set and stick to deadlines.
- Inadequate root cause analysis: Fixing symptoms doesn’t prevent recurrence.
- Poor documentation: If it’s not recorded, it didn’t happen.
✅ Best practice: Integrate audit findings into your continuous improvement program and safety KPIs.
Why This Matters for Hazard Management
Effectively closing audit findings is not just administrative work — it's a cornerstone of hazard control.
For example, if an audit uncovers exposed electrical wiring, leaving it unresolved puts workers at risk of electric shock. Similarly, poorly stored chemical containers could lead to leaks, fires, or toxic exposure.
This is where workplace safety education like the NEBOSH course truly proves its value. Though some might hesitate due to NEBOSH course fees, the return on investment is clear — safer workplaces, legal compliance, and improved organizational reputation.
🎓 Read more about how to justify the cost of the NEBOSH course fees or find the best institute for NEBOSH in Pakistan.
A Real-Life Example: When Audit Follow-Up Saved Lives
In one logistics company, an audit revealed poor ventilation in the chemical storage area. Initially, it was deemed low priority since no one worked in that room regularly. However, after a proactive safety officer insisted on a full investigation, they discovered a slow gas leak.
Corrective action involved installing a new ventilation system and gas detectors. A week later, a detector alarmed during off-hours. Emergency crews confirmed a potentially lethal gas buildup — but no one was harmed.
The lesson? Never take audit findings lightly.
Empowering Safety Officers and Decision Makers
If you're in a leadership role or training to become a safety officer, it's your responsibility to champion these practices. Closing audit findings effectively can prevent injuries, save money on insurance, and foster a stronger safety culture.
A course like the NEBOSH International General Certificate equips you with the tools to:
- Understand audit reports
- Conduct risk assessments
- Design corrective actions
- Communicate safety changes
Don’t let the NEBOSH course fees deter you. The knowledge and credibility you gain far outweigh the cost.
Final Thoughts
Closing out audit findings is more than just a compliance task — it’s a proactive approach to building a safer, more resilient workplace. By following the steps we discussed, safety professionals and organizations can ensure that risks are managed properly and workers are protected.
When audit findings are ignored, accidents are often not far behind. But when they are addressed diligently and effectively, they become stepping stones to improvement.
Take the first step. Commit to resolving safety issues swiftly and thoroughly. And if you’re preparing for a career in safety or enhancing your qualifications, consider enrolling in a recognized training program.